2000 Vector M12 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vector M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vector M12 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector M12 (484 HP) has 341 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2000 Vector M12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Vector M12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Vector M12 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Vector | Ford |
Model | M12 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5707 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 484 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |