2000 Vector RD 180 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vector RD 180. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vector RD 180 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Vector RD 180 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector RD 180 (180 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector RD 180 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 2000 Vector RD 180 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Vector RD 180. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Vector RD 180. (175 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Vector RD 180 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Vector | Holden |
| Model | RD 180 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2685 mm |
