2000 Volkswagen Hac vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 849 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (310 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Volkswagen Hac | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
Model | Hac | XC90 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2401 cc |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1331 kg | 2180 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2860 mm |