2000 Volkswagen Hac vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (302 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (370 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (310 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Volkswagen Hac | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Hac | ML |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3500 cc |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2916 mm |
