2000 Volkswagen Hac vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volkswagen Hac weights approximately 36 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (310 Nm). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Volkswagen Hac | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Suzuki |
| Model | Hac | Equator |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3953 cc |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1331 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3560 mm |
