2000 Volkswagen Sharan vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Sharan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Sharan would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Volkswagen Sharan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Sharan (201 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Sharan should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 2000 Volkswagen Sharan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Sharan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Sharan (271 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Sharan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Volkswagen Sharan | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Volkswagen | Holden |
Model | Sharan | Epica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |