2000 Volvo S60 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,434 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Volvo S60 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Volvo | Westfield |
| Model | S60 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2434 cc | 1779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |
