2000 Westfield ZEI vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Westfield ZEI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Westfield ZEI would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Westfield ZEI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Westfield ZEI (129 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2000 Westfield ZEI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Westfield ZEI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Westfield ZEI | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Westfield | Ford |
Model | ZEI | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3550 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2490 mm |