2000 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 864 kg more than 2000 ZAZ Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (3,200 Nm) has 3121 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 ZAZ Wagon. (79 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 ZAZ Wagon. 2012 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 2000 ZAZ Wagon has manual transmission. 2000 ZAZ Wagon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 ZAZ Wagon | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | ZAZ | Volvo |
Model | Wagon | S60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 3200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2776 mm |