2001 AC Aceca vs. 1946 Buick 40
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2001 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 AC Aceca | 1946 Buick 40 | |
| Make | AC | Buick |
| Model | Aceca | 40 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 5249 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 109.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1845 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3000 mm |
