2001 AC Aceca vs. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 60 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | AC | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Aceca | 6C |
Year Released | 2001 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3010 mm |