2001 AC Aceca vs. 1965 ZAZ 966

To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 770 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2001 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.

Compare all specifications:

2001 AC Aceca 1965 ZAZ 966
Make AC ZAZ
Model Aceca 966
Year Released 2001 1965
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 4600 cc 887 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 301 HP 27 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 407 Nm 52 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1510 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 3740 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2170 mm