2001 AC Aceca vs. 1980 Audi 80
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 80 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 600 kg more than 1980 Audi 80.
Because 2001 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 AC Aceca | 1980 Audi 80 | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Aceca | 80 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2550 mm |
