2001 AC Aceca vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 530 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | AC | Buick |
Model | Aceca | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2580 mm |