2001 AC Aceca vs. 1995 BMW CLS
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2001 AC Aceca. (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2001 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2001 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 AC Aceca | 1995 BMW CLS | |
| Make | AC | BMW |
| Model | Aceca | CLS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1360 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2710 mm |
