2001 AC Aceca vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 305 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | 626 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2620 mm |