2001 AC Aceca vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 293 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 960 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 AC Aceca | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | AC | MCC |
| Model | Aceca | Smart |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
