2001 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 AC Aceca. (400 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Aceca | Maloo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |