2001 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Audi TT
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 2001 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 2000 Audi TT | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | TT |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2430 mm |