2001 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Sentra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Sentra would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Sentra. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Sentra.
Because 2001 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Sentra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Sentra. (176 Nm). This means 2001 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Sentra.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 2000 Nissan Sentra | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Aceca | Sentra |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 73 L |