2001 AC Aceca vs. 2000 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,988 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2000 TVR Griffith. (320 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 TVR Griffith. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 560 kg more than 2000 TVR Griffith. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 TVR Griffith (434 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 AC Aceca. (400 Nm). This means 2000 TVR Griffith will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 2000 TVR Griffith | |
Make | AC | TVR |
Model | Aceca | Griffith |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 320 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 434 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2290 mm |