2001 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac
To start off, 2001 AC Aceca is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 279 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (310 Nm). This means 2001 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 2000 Volkswagen Hac | |
Make | AC | Volkswagen |
Model | Aceca | Hac |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1331 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2520 mm |