2001 AC Aceca vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 50 kg more than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (190 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2001 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
Make | AC | Isuzu |
Model | Aceca | KB |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2197 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 75 L |