2001 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 245 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 AC Aceca weights approximately 159 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Aceca | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Aceca | C30 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |