2001 AC Cobra vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 AC Cobra would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (208 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 978 kg more than 2001 AC Cobra.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 AC Cobra (400 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2001 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2001 AC Cobra | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Cobra | XC90 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 2038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2650 mm |