2001 Acura CL vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2001 Acura CL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura CL (225 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Acura CL weights approximately 650 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura CL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura CL | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | CL | Cedric |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2540 mm |