2001 Acura EL vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Acura EL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2001 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1015 kg more than 2001 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura EL | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | EL | 62 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1666 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3310 mm |