2001 Acura EL vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Acura EL is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2001 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 910 kg more than 2001 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Acura EL | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | EL | 62 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1666 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3300 mm |
