2001 Acura EL vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2001 Acura EL is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2001 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2001 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 220 kg more than 2001 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura EL | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | EL | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1666 cc | 5766 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2960 mm |