2001 Acura EL vs. 1982 Pontiac Lemans
To start off, 2001 Acura EL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac Lemans. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac Lemans would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac Lemans is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Pontiac Lemans weights approximately 280 kg more than 2001 Acura EL.
Because 1982 Pontiac Lemans is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Pontiac Lemans. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Pontiac Lemans has automatic transmission and 2001 Acura EL has manual transmission. 2001 Acura EL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Pontiac Lemans will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura EL | 1982 Pontiac Lemans | |
Make | Acura | Pontiac |
Model | EL | Lemans |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1666 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2750 mm |