2001 Acura EL vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,666 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura EL (124 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura EL (155 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2001 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Acura EL | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | EL | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1666 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2525 mm |
