2001 Acura Integra vs. 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue
To start off, 2001 Acura Integra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura Integra | 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | Integra | Park Avenue |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3300 mm |