2001 Acura Integra vs. 1992 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2001 Acura Integra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2001 Acura Integra. (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2001 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Acura Integra. (176 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Acura Integra | 1992 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Acura | Ford |
| Model | Integra | Taurus |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 2986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.3 mm | 89.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
