2001 Acura NSX vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Acura | Jaguar |
Model | NSX | XK |
Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2600 mm |