2001 Acura NSX vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | NSX | 62 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |