2001 Acura NSX vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP) has 440 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | NSX | Master RR |
Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 40 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |