2001 Acura NSX vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Acura NSX. (304 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | NSX | 62 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 582 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 75 L |