2001 Acura NSX vs. 1967 Holden HR
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (304 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1967 Holden HR | |
Make | Acura | Holden |
Model | NSX | HR |
Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |