2001 Acura NSX vs. 1977 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 433 more horse power than 1977 Suzuki Cervo. (47 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1977 Suzuki Cervo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (304 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Suzuki Cervo. (82 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Suzuki Cervo. 2001 Acura NSX has automatic transmission and 1977 Suzuki Cervo has manual transmission. 1977 Suzuki Cervo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Acura NSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1977 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Acura | Suzuki |
Model | NSX | Cervo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 82 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2040 mm |