2001 Acura NSX vs. 1982 Dodge 600
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 387 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 2001 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (179 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1982 Dodge 600 | |
Make | Acura | Dodge |
Model | NSX | 600 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 179 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |