2001 Acura NSX vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 421 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7. 2001 Acura NSX has automatic transmission and 1982 Jeep CJ7 has manual transmission. 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Acura NSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Acura | Jeep |
Model | NSX | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 128 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2380 mm |