2001 Acura NSX vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP) has 230 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Clio. (407 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Clio. 2001 Acura NSX has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Acura NSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Acura | Renault |
Model | NSX | Clio |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |