2001 Acura NSX vs. 1997 BMW M3
To start off, 2001 Acura NSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1997 BMW M3. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (304 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW M3. (236 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW M3. 2001 Acura NSX has automatic transmission and 1997 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1997 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Acura NSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 1997 BMW M3 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | NSX | M3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 236 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2710 mm |