2001 Acura NSX vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (207 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | NSX | XC90 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2860 mm |