2001 Acura NSX vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (223 HP) has 149 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2001 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura NSX (304 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (190 Nm). This means 2001 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | NSX | Aveo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 304 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2525 mm |