2001 Acura NSX vs. 2012 Opel Ampera
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Acura NSX would be higher.
Because 2001 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Ampera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Acura NSX | 2012 Opel Ampera | |
| Make | Acura | Opel |
| Model | NSX | Ampera |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Horse Power | 480 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 35 L |
