2001 Acura NSX vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-09 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Because 2001 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (366 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Acura NSX. (304 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda CX-09 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura NSX | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | NSX | CX-09 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 76 L |