2001 Acura RL vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Acura RL is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura RL (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2001 Acura RL.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Acura RL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura RL | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | RL | 62 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 5676 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3210 mm |