2001 Acura RL vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2001 Acura RL is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura RL (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Acura RL weights approximately 590 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura RL (304 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Acura RL | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | RL | Cedric |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2540 mm |