2001 Acura RL vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2001 Acura RL is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Acura RL (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Acura RL weights approximately 905 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Acura RL (304 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Acura RL | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Acura | Zastava |
| Model | RL | 102 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 3472 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2160 mm |
